POST CONTENTS……………………………….
SUMMARY OF THE EFFECTS OF FEAR ON OUR BRAINS
FEAR AFFECTS THE ABILITY TO THINK CLEARLY
FEAR AFFECTS THE ABILITY TO ACT LOGICALLY
OVERVIEW OF PRESIDENT TRUMP’S RELATIONSHIP WITH FEAR
Fear of Being Shamed Explains a Lot About Mr. Trump
Fear of Being Seen as a "Loser" or Weak
Fear of Showing Personal Vulnerability
Fear of Losing Power and Influence
Fear of Political Liberals and Progressives
Fear of Social Justice Movements
Fear of Being Held Legally Accountable for His Actions
Fear of Not Being Seen as Wealthy
Fear of His Personal Physical Decline and Aesthetic Imperfection
TRUMP’S RHETORIC RESONATES WITH THE HIS SUPPORTER’S BECAUSE HE TELLS IT LIKE IT IS
HOW TRUMP LEVERAGES FEAR FOR POLITICAL POWER
BULLIES USE FEAR AS A WEAPON TO CONTROL OTHERS
THE SPECIAL CASE OF REPUBLICAN CONGRESSPERSONS
HOW WEAPONIZE KNOWLEDGE OF TRUMP’S FEARS
THINGS YOU CAN DO TO MAKE AMERICA BETTER
SUMMARY OF THE EFFECTS OF FEAR ON OUR BRAINS
Here is Perplexity AI’s brief summary of how fear and anxiety affect our brains:
Fear activates strong emotional and survival responses in the brain, particularly triggering areas like the amygdala. This response shifts mental resources away from rational thought and problem-solving (handled by the prefrontal cortex) toward immediate protection and threat avoidance. As a result, people tend to:
Focus on perceived dangers and react impulsively,
Overestimate risks and negative outcomes,
Base decisions on emotions and quick fixes rather than facts or careful reasoning.
Overall, fear clouds judgment and makes it harder to think logically, leading to choices guided more by emotion and self-protection than by objective analysis or evidence.
See Psychology and Biology of Fear for more understanding.
FEAR AFFECTS THE ABILITY TO THINK CLEARLY
Perhaps the worst consequences of fear and anxiety are the effects on the ability to think straight and make good decisions. These effects are outlined in this link: Fear Affects the Ability to Think Clearly. Here are some key points:
Fear can impair cognitive processes involved in decision-making, such as risk assessment and judgment.
When fear is unconscious or unacknowledged, it can distort reality and lead to an exaggeration of perceived threats, clouding rational decision-making.
Physiologically, fear increases the secretion of cortisol, a stress hormone that can impact cognitive functioning and decision-making abilities.
The relationship between fear and decision-making is complex and can be exacerbated by pre-existing factors (e.g., clinical anxiety/depression, early life trauma/abuse, Impaired fear extinction capacity, etc.) present in the psychological background of people who perceive real or imagined fear.
The effects of real of imagined fear may be moderated by gender, physiological factors, and other contextual variables present in individuals and their communities.
See How Does Fear Influence Risk Assessment and Decision-Making? in Psychology Today for insights about fear and decision-making that help explain why President Trump does some of the unpredictable, illogical, egregious things he does — including promoting conspiracy theories. Here is how perplexity ai reports the relationship of fear and anxiety to belief in conspiracy theories:
Fear and anxiety increase motivations to make sense of threatening situations (including abstract, existential fears) making them more likely to attribute events to the actions of hostile conspiracies.
Negative emotions like anxiety, uncertainty, and lack of control are psychological origins of conspiracy beliefs.
Belief in conspiracy theories often arises from emotional and intuitive processes rather than analytic reasoning.
Negative emotions—especially anxiety, uncertainty, and lack of control—heighten peoples’ motivation to make sense of complex or threatening situations over which they have no control leading them to endorse conspiratorial explanations.
Conspiracy theories tend to gain traction during anxiety-provoking societal events such as elections, terrorism, pandemics, or natural disasters, when threats and uncertainty are elevated in news or by political leaders’ fearmongering rhetoric.
People who have chronic anxiety have a greater likelihood of endorsing conspiracy theories.
Anxiety induces a sense of lack of control in anxious people and increases their tendency to believe in all kinds of conspiracy theories
Situations that undermine a person’s sense of control or heighten uncertainty also increase the likelihood of believing in conspiracies. Such beliefs can offer seemingly clear answers that reduce the discomfort associated with ambiguity.
Rather than providing psychological relief, conspiracy theories may perpetuate or even intensify anxiety and existential uncertainty.
Endorsement of conspiracy theories is accompanied by elevated vigilance to recognize real or imagined threats and behaviors by others.
Personal histories of experiencing fear, anxiety, lack of control and exposure to fearmongering political rhetoric predispose people to believe in conspiracy theories by activating sense-making motivations designed to comfort anxious people.
Despite hopes that conspiratorial explanations might alleviate discomfort, evidence shows that belief in conspiracy theories does not reduce anxiety or improve well-being. Instead, they can foster a self-reinforcing cycle of mistrust and existential threat.
Cold, non-emotional thinking associated with analytical thinking decreases as belief in conspiracy theories grows.
Individuals who endorse conspiracy theories tend to be more anxious and less tolerant of ambiguity compared to those who don’t believe in conspiracy theories.
Conspiracy beliefs are grounded in emotions rather than analytic thinking.
We learn from all this that the pervasive fear and anxiety that motivates most of President Trump’s behaviors are very real, powerful, and destructive. When we consider this reality alongside the fact that Godly love is the only power that conquers fear and gives us a sound mind, we must conclude that Godly love for neighbors is the only antidote for the fear that motivates him.
FEAR AFFECTS THE ABILITY TO ACT LOGICALLY
Many people, including some of his supporters, don’t understand why some of the things Mr. Trump are inconsistent with things he previously said or did. The reason is that Fear Affects the Ability to Act Logically. Here is a summary of what science knows about this as reported in Perplexity AI:
Fear impairs logical decision-making abilities because it activates brain regions and physiological responses that prioritize quick, protective actions over rational evaluation. When we are afraid, the amygdala (the brain's fear center) becomes highly active, triggering the body's "fight, flight, or freeze" response and redirecting mental resources toward threat detection and avoidance. This shift can overwhelm the prefrontal cortex—the brain area responsible for reasoning, planning, and logical thought—making it harder to weigh evidence, consider alternatives, or anticipate long-term consequences.
Key mechanisms by which fear disrupts logical decision-making:
Risk Overestimation: Fear leads people to overestimate dangers and negative outcomes, causing them to avoid situations that may not be as hazardous as perceived and to become overly risk-averse.
Tunnel Vision and Impulsivity: Fear narrows attention to immediate threats, fostering "tunnel vision" and impulsive, short-term decisions, often neglecting broader or long-term considerations.
Cognitive Freezing and Paralysis: For some, fear causes decision paralysis or "analysis paralysis," where anxiety about making the wrong decision leads to procrastination or avoidance of any choice at all.
Reduced Higher-Order Thinking: When fear spills over into the frontal lobe, responsible for logic and complex reasoning, it hampers these processes and makes individuals more susceptible to emotion-driven or irrational choices.
Negative Bias: Emotional responses like fear act as shortcuts (heuristics), skewing how we assess risks and benefits, leading to greater pessimism and an exaggerated focus on negative possibilities.
In summary, fear triggers instinctive survival circuits at the expense of slow, deliberate reasoning, making people more likely to act defensively, overlook logical evidence, or fail to pursue beneficial opportunities due to exaggerated perceptions of danger.
The following link are scholarly publications that explain the psychology of these behaviors:
OVERVIEW OF PRESIDENT TRUMP’S RELATIONSHIP WITH FEAR
Some experts have argued that Trump’s politics and rhetoric are calculated tactics designed to agitate and exploit Americans existing fears for his personal gain. Others argue that everything he says and does in life, business and politics are natural projections of his personal fears and anxieties. The truth, no doubt, is that both arguments are true because Mr. Trump, like all people, is a complex person.
The purpose of this post is not to debate whether Mr. Trump purposely used/uses fear as a tool to get elected and/or exploit his base for money, praise and votes. Rather, the purpose of this post is to demonstrate that Mr. Trump’s psyche embodies personal fears and anxieties that strongly affect all his behaviors in life, business and government in complex ways.
This proposition is not exclusive to Mr. Trump. What makes these cause/effect factors worth investigating is the fact that he is the President of the United States. Moreover, he is a president whose rhetoric, policies and behaviors cause worldwide uncertainty and chaos. In other words, understanding of Trump’s fears and anxieties is not just a matter of politics or intellectual curiosity. In fact, what he does and does not do has become a matter of security (e.g. emotional, financial, physical, global, etc.) for all citizens of the world who are victims of his fears.
Psychological research and expert analyses indicate that Donald Trump’s psyche is shaped by personal fears and anxieties, but these do not manifest in the typical ways people might expect. Instead of deep introspection or self-doubt, Trump’s behavior is marked by a lack of narrative self-understanding, impulsivity, and a relentless focus on the present moment. He rarely reflects on his past or plans for the future, instead acting in ways that maximize immediate advantage and gratification.
Trump’s personality profile, as assessed by psychologists, is dominated by traits such as ambition, dominance, self-serving behavior, impulsivity, and a tendency toward aggression and volatility. There is also evidence of narcissistic tendencies, which can manifest as extreme sensitivity to criticism and a need for constant validation39. While Trump can be reactive—people can “get under his skin”—he is also highly resistant to withdrawal or avoidance, meaning he confronts challenges head-on, often with aggression rather than retreat.
Some experts argue that Trump’s emotional fragility and intolerance of realities that conflict with his self-image predispose him to defensive behaviors, delusions, and even psychotic spirals when challenged. However, he does not exhibit the kind of anxiety that leads to withdrawal or introspection; instead, his anxieties appear to drive him toward confrontation, self-promotion, and a refusal to acknowledge mistakes or vulnerability.
Trump’s personal fears and anxieties strongly influence his behaviors in life, business, and government, but primarily through impulsive, aggressive, and self-protective actions rather than through introspection or avoidance. His lack of a cohesive personal narrative and his need for dominance and validation shape a unique psychological profile that has profound effects on his leadership and decision-making.
Here are several articles that begin to explain why Mr. Trump does what he does:
The degree to which fear motivates Trump’s thinking and behaviors is clearly indicated in this quote by Donald Trump during a conversation with journalists Bob Woodward and Robert Costa on March 31, 2016, at the Old Post Office Pavilion, Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C. The context of this statement is Trump’s philosophy on leadership and influence: he was explaining that instilling fear is, in his view, a fundamental source of real power.
“True power is — I hesitate to even say it — fear”.
The context of this statement is an interview by Woodward and Costa with Trump about his philosophy on leadership and influence. Without shame or caution, he explained that instilling fear is, in his view, a fundamental source of real power. The quote encapsulates Trump’s belief that fear is an effective means to exert and maintain control over others. Some Americans saw evidence of that philosophy at work in Trump’s first term as president. All Americans and, indeed the whole world, are now witnessing and experiencing the full force of that philosophy in his second term.
It is not necessary to be a journalist or academic to understand that this philosophy has been a consistent feature of Trump’s behavior. He has used fear as a tool privately and publicly to coerce opponents, critics, business partners and even allies into submission through threats, public humiliation, and aggressive rhetoric that he uses successfully to silence dissent and consolidate his authority. It is no understatement that he is ruthless and unrestrained in the use of fear to accomplish his personal and political goals. But why he acts this way is the question.
Trump has extended this use of fear beyond individuals to institutions such as Congress, the judiciary, business, higher education, and the media always with the goal of making dissent or disagreement with him untenable.
Trump’s relationship with fear is summarized plainly by The New York Times editorial board, in its statement "Standing Up to Donald Trump's Fear Tactics." In its January 17, 2025, the editorial board warns that there is a real and present danger that America’s institutions could succumb to Donald Trump’s campaign of intimidation and describes how he has long used fear as a tool to coerce opponents, critics, and allies into submission, both in business and politics.
As president, Trump exploits the power of his office and social media reach to create distress for anyone who opposes him, aiming to make dissent and disagreement unbearable and compel self-censorship rather openly challenging him. Here is an excerpt from the editorial:
“True power is — I hesitate to even say it — fear.” This statement was made by Donald Trump during a conversation with Bob Woodward. Fear has consistently been a favored instrument for the president-elect, who has wielded it for years to coerce opponents, critics, and even allies into submission. He constructed his real estate dominance through threats and legal battles against competitors and collaborators.
Through humiliation and aggressive rhetoric, he has intimidated and eliminated political rivals. He has solidified his grip on the Republican Party, silencing dissenters within the G.O.P. through coercion and threats to end their political careers. As president, he exploited the authority of his office and the reach of social media to create distress for those who fell out of favor with him.
The objective of these maneuvers has been to compel individuals to self-censor rather than challenge his authority. Now, as he readies himself to resume his role in the Oval Office, Trump is extending his use of fear beyond Congress to include critical independent institutions like the judiciary, corporate sectors, higher education, and the media. The overarching aim remains unchanged: to dissuade elected officials, judges, executives, and others from carrying out their responsibilities in ways that could confront or hold him accountable. He seeks to render dissent unbearable.... It is imperative that America’s leaders and institutions remain resolute. They must exhibit bravery and fortitude in the face of Trump's tactics while continuing to fulfill their distinct roles in our democracy. Vigilance is paramount: yielding to fear or coercion — whether by capitulating or justifying the avoidance of conflict — not only emboldens future transgressions but also undermines their own power and influence1.
The editorial outlines how Trump is now extending these tactics beyond Congress to target core independent institutions such as the judiciary, corporate sector, higher education, and the media. The board stresses that this approach seeks to deter elected officials, judges, executives, and others from carrying out their duties if doing so would challenge Trump or hold him accountable. The editorial cites examples of lawmakers and business leaders who have relented under pressure, as well as corporations and tech executives who have shifted to support Trump, often to avoid retaliation or to gain favor.
The board calls on America’s leaders and institutions to remain resolute, emphasizing three guiding principles: conviction to do what is right despite pressure, recognition that loyalty to Trump is transactional and unreliable, and trust in the American system of checks and balances. The editorial urges institutions to resist improper directives, support investigative journalism, and, when necessary, pursue litigation to counter abuses of power. It concludes that yielding to fear or coercion only emboldens further transgressions and undermines the nation’s democratic foundations. The board insists that the country’s principles are too important to sacrifice in the face of intimidation, and that resilience and courage are essential to preserving democracy.
These are all reasonable exhortations for people who are not burdened by pervasive fear and anxiety. But the logic of doing the right thing for self and others falls on deaf ears for too many Americans who, like Trump, conduct their lives in a social/political/religious atmosphere of fear and anxiety. This habitual way of thinking handicaps them from doing the right thing for themselves and others. In other words, they think like and act like Trump. The result is chaos.
Donald Trump’s public rhetoric is saturated with fearmongering that reflects his fears and stokes the existing fears of his followers. This rhetoric is a defining feature of his political communication. Across rallies, speeches, interviews, and social media, Trump repeatedly paints a dire, apocalyptic vision of America’s future should he or his party lose power.
At his rallies, Trump frequently warns supporters that “you won’t have a country anymore” if he is not elected, predicting catastrophic outcomes such as World War III, economic collapse, and rampant violence by immigrant gangs. He has told farmers, for example, that if he loses, “You won’t have a farm,” and has described scenarios where factories close, farmers are ruined, and an economic “blood bath” engulfs the nation. He also claims that defeat would mean the destruction of Israel and the invasion of American communities by violent criminals.
Trump’s rhetoric often includes graphic and alarming language, such as asserting that migrants will “cut your throat” and describing his opponents in dehumanizing or extreme terms. He has called Vice President Kamala Harris “mentally impaired” and suggested that only he can prevent the country from being destroyed, casting himself as the sole savior in a moment of existential crisis.
Academic and journalistic analyses confirm that fearmongering is central to Trump’s approach. His speeches and social media posts are designed to prick and amplify anxieties about crime, immigration, economic insecurity, and national decline. He often exaggerates or fabricates threats. Political scientists and historians note that this strategy is intended to emotionally mobilize his base, delegitimize opponents, and consolidate his own power by presenting himself as the only solution to the dangers he describes.
In summary, Trump’s public rhetoric consistently leverages fear — often through exaggerated or false claims — to motivate supporters, intimidate opponents, and frame himself as the divine savior who can deliver people from a host of looming threats. To those who do not support him, however, he is nothing more or less than a bully.
EXAMPLES OF TRUMP’S FEARS
Here are a few notable examples of Trump’s many fears:
Fear of Being Shamed Explains a Lot About Mr. Trump
See this link for a printable version of this narrative on Trump’s fear.
The following is a word-for-word copy of a report directly from Perplexity AI:
Several psychological analyses and commentaries suggest that Donald Trump is strongly motivated by a fear of shame, which deeply influences his behavior and public persona. According to therapists and mental health experts who have written about Trump's psychology, there is evidence that he employs extreme strategies to avoid feelings of shame or to prevent being seen as inferior or weak. This avoidance often manifests as aggressive self-promotion, refusal to admit mistakes, and attacking or blaming others for any perceived slight or criticism.
Some psychologists describe Trump as having a "shame-ridden core self" that cannot be acknowledged or confronted. As a result, he projects grandiosity, engages in paranoia, and compulsively seeks to dominate conversations and interactions to avoid facing humiliation or public embarrassment. His refusal to admit wrongdoing, persistent self-aggrandizement, and tendency to blame others all function as protective mechanisms against feeling shame, which would feel psychologically annihilating to him.
Furthermore, scholars point out that Trump has developed what sociologist Arlie Russell Hochschild calls an "anti-shame ritual," wherein he transforms personal or group shame into outward blame and grievance—a process that also appeals to supporters who experience their own social shame. Analysts warn that this pattern is deeply entrenched and unlikely to change, even if Trump is caught in clear wrongdoing.
In summary, expert commentary indicates that a fear of being shamed or seen as a "loser" is a central driver of Donald Trump's behavior, shaping not only how he responds to criticism but also how he constructs his public identity and political strategy.
http://www.stevemackeylmft.com/does-donald-trump-feel-shame.html
AUTHORITARIAN AND NARCISSISTIC TRAITS ARE ALL RELATED TO SHAME
Fear of Being Seen as a "Loser" or Weak
See this link for a printable version of this narrative on Trump’s fear.
Donald Trump’s fear of being seen as a "loser" or weak is a deeply ingrained aspect of his personality and public behavior, shaping much of his rhetoric and decision-making.
Lifelong Aversion to Weakness: According to family members and close observers, Trump was raised with the belief that "weakness was perhaps the greatest sin of all" in the Trump family. His father’s admonitions to be a "killer" and to avoid any admission of vulnerability profoundly influenced Trump’s worldview. Tony Schwartz, co-author of The Art of the Deal, has said that "weakness is Trump’s greatest fear by far"4.
Public Persona and Rhetoric: Trump’s public language is filled with denunciations of "weak" people and praise for "winners." He frequently urges others to avoid being "weak and stupid," as seen in his social media posts3. He derides political opponents and even entire groups as "weak," projecting an image of unyielding strength and dominance.
Avoidance and Deflection: When confronted with setbacks or the prospect of public failure, Trump often retreats, changes the subject, or attempts to shift blame, hoping to avoid the perception of defeat. Analysts have noted that his history is one of retreat when faced with resolute opposition or the risk of being labeled a loser1.
Refusal to Show Vulnerability: Trump has gone to great lengths to avoid any public acknowledgment of vulnerability, such as refusing to wear a mask during the COVID-19 pandemic or downplaying his own illness. Admitting to frailty, illness, or error is "tantamount in his mind to an impermissible admission of weakness"4.
Debate Avoidance and Media Strategy: Trump’s reluctance to participate in debates—especially when he risks being challenged or appearing less sharp than his opponents—has been interpreted as a sign of his fear of being seen as weak or losing in a public forum. Even his advisors and media allies have acknowledged that avoiding debates can be perceived as a sign of weakness, not strength.
Trump’s fear of being seen as a "loser" or weak is a central driver of his public persona, rhetoric, and actions. He works tirelessly to project strength, avoid vulnerability, and deflect or retreat from situations that might expose him to the perception of defeat or frailty. See the following links for examples:
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-mary-trump-hush-money-trial-1893167
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/04/donald-trump-manhattan-trial-fear/678144/
Fear of Educated People
See this link for a printable version of this narrative on Trump’s fear.
Donald Trump has frequently claimed to possess exceptional intellectual abilities. He has often described himself as "very, very smart" and a "very stable genius," pointing to his business success, political victories, and performance on cognitive assessments as evidence of his mental acuity. For example, Trump has repeatedly boasted about "acing" a cognitive test—the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)—during his 2018 health checkup, claiming a perfect score of 30/30, though the official results have not been released. He has also cited his memory, once stating he has "one of the great memories of all time." Trump has often asserted his exceptional intelligence. Despite his boasting, his claims are largely self-reported and not substantiated by publicly available standardized test results.
Trump fears highly educated people because this sector of the population tends to vote Democratic. That tendency threatens his own ability to win elections and explains his claim to “love uneducated people” which is an admission that his political popularity is centered in people who do not have high levels of education.
This tendency appreciation for less educated voters extends to Republican colleagues running for elections in Congress and state governments. Their political bases also include voters with less education. All Republicans depend on the support of voters with lower educations. See these links for articles that explain how education level influences voting habits:
https://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2025/ask-the-expert-trumps-actions-to-the-department-of-education
https://apnews.com/article/trump-dismantling-education-department-8b5d0961700f0fe69d18ea80b437c8b8
https://www.aclu.org/news/racial-justice/trumps-attack-on-the-department-of-education-explained
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/sep/29/donald-trump-still-king-poorly-educated/
https://apnews.com/article/trump-woke-education-24f864d83e2f5745d12a79ebac0d7cc4
https://thefulcrum.us/civic-engagement-education/donald-trump-education
Fear of Being Irrelevant
See this link for a printable version of this narrative of Trump’s fear.
Donald Trump’s actions and rhetoric consistently reveal a deep concern with maintaining relevance and dominance in the political and cultural landscape. His fear of irrelevance is reflected in his behavior, policies, and public statements, which always aim to reinforce his centrality and control. Everything he says and does reflect a consistent effort to combat fears of irrelevance by asserting dominance over political discourse, reshaping institutions, and maintaining loyalty among his base. His strategies—whether through polarizing rhetoric, aggressive policy changes, or media manipulation—are designed to ensure that he remains central to American politics and culture. This drive for relevance appears to be a defining feature of his leadership style and public persona as shown in the following examples:
Declining Influence:
Reports have highlighted moments when Trump’s directives were ignored by his own allies, such as during Kevin McCarthy’s bid for House Speaker in early 2023. Despite Trump’s efforts to rally support, prominent Republican figures openly defied him, signaling a decline in his political sway2.
His failed endorsements of high-profile candidates like Mehmet Oz and Herschel Walker in the 2022 midterms further undermined his influence, with media outlets labeling him a "loser" for the GOP’s poor results2.
Aggressive Policy Moves: Trump’s sweeping executive orders and efforts to dismantle institutions like the Department of Education reflect an attempt to leave a lasting legacy and reshape American governance in his image. Such actions can be interpreted as a way to cement his relevance by forcing the country to engage with his vision, even if controversial911.
Rhetorical Strategies: Trump frequently uses polarizing rhetoric to position himself as the indispensable leader of a movement against liberal elites and progressive values. By framing cultural and political debates as existential battles, he ensures that he remains at the center of public discourse59.
Media Focus: Trump has shown sensitivity to how he is portrayed in the media, often lashing out at critics or outlets that diminish his relevance. His attacks on institutions like Harvard or the press serve dual purposes: rallying his base and ensuring continued attention on him11.
Authoritarian Tendencies: Analysts have noted that Trump’s authoritarian inclinations—such as attempts to consolidate power over federal agencies—are partly driven by a desire to maintain control and avoid being sidelined by institutional checks or political rivals69.
Fear of Showing Personal Vulnerability
See this link for a printable version of this narrative of Trump’s fear.
Trump consistently projects an image of invulnerability, avoiding displays of humility, empathy, or emotional openness. This behavior stems from a deep-seated fear of being perceived as weak or fallible.
He has concealed personal failures, such as financial struggles, to maintain an image of success and strength.
Critics argue that his lack of emotional intelligence—such as empathy and self-regulation—has led to impulsive actions, heightened aggression, and strained relationships with both allies and opponents.
Trump’s upbringing, marked by a critical father and a focus on toughness, likely contributed to his fear of vulnerability. This aligns with societal norms that discourage men from expressing emotions openly.
His refusal to show vulnerability has alienated many voters who value authenticity in leadership. His focus on strength over sincerity prevents him from being perceived as relatable or empathetic. His aggressive rhetoric and inability to take accountability for mistakes further reinforce this disconnect.
Fear of Foreigners/Immigrants
See this link for a printable version of this narrative of Trump’s fear.
Donald Trump has consistently expressed rhetoric and supported policies that reflect a deep suspicion of, and hostility toward, foreigners and immigrants. Trump’s words and actions demonstrate a persistent pattern of portraying immigrants and foreigners as threats, using fear-based rhetoric and policies to mobilize political support. His public statements and actions reveal a pattern of xenophobia and nativism:
Campaign and Presidential Rhetoric: Trump launched his 2016 presidential campaign by characterizing Mexican immigrants as "rapists" and criminals, and repeatedly described immigrants as sources of drugs and crime123. He also called for a ban on all Muslims entering the United States, a policy widely criticized as Islamophobic and rooted in fear of foreigners2.
Policy Proposals and Actions: His administration implemented strict immigration policies, including travel bans targeting predominantly Muslim countries, efforts to reduce legal immigration, and attempts to end protections for certain immigrant groups23. He frequently advocated building a wall on the southern border as a central campaign promise.
Rhetoric About Specific Groups: Trump has used derogatory language to describe immigrants from certain countries, referring to nations in Africa, as well as Haiti and El Salvador, as "shithole countries," and suggested the U.S. should accept more immigrants from places like Norway17. He has also linked the COVID-19 pandemic to China using terms like "Chinese virus" and "Kung flu," which fueled anti-Asian sentiment6.
Political Strategy: Studies and analyses show that Trump’s political success has been closely tied to stoking fears about immigrants and foreigners, appealing to voters with anti-immigrant, racist, and xenophobic attitudes5. His rallies and messaging have been linked to increases in hate crimes and prejudiced violence in areas where he has strong support5.
Personal Statements: Trump has questioned the legitimacy of American citizens with immigrant backgrounds, such as suggesting that a U.S.-born judge with Mexican heritage could not be impartial, and telling congresswomen of color to "go back" to the "broken and crime infested countries they came from," even though most were born in the U.S.127.
Fear of Losing Power and Influence
See this link for printable version of this narrative of Trump’s fear.
Trump’s words and actions often appear designed not only to maintain political power but also to address personal fears—of irrelevance, loss of control, or being undermined by opponents. By polarizing debates, demanding loyalty, and consolidating authority, he creates an environment where he remains central and indispensable. While these strategies serve political purposes, they also reflect deeper psychological motivations tied to fear and insecurity.
Donald Trump's actions and rhetoric can be interpreted as efforts to address his own insecurities and fears, particularly regarding challenges to his authority, reputation, and ideological dominance. His strategies typically reflect a desire to maintain control and project strength in a constant effort to assuage underlying fears.
Framing Opponents as Existential Threats: Trump’s rhetoric frequently casts progressives, liberals, and other opponents as threats to the nation’s values or security. This binary framing simplifies complex issues into battles of good versus evil, which not only rallies his base but also reinforces his role as a protector against these "threats"10. By portraying himself as indispensable, Trump addresses fears of losing relevance or control.
Obsession with Loyalty: Trump places immense importance on loyalty, both in his administration and among his supporters. This is evident in his efforts to replace career civil servants with loyalists and his dismissal of officials who challenge him38. Such actions suggest a deep aversion to dissent or perceived betrayal, reflecting fears of disloyalty undermining his authority.
Cultural Polarization as a Strategy: Donald Trump's actions and rhetoric can be interpreted as efforts to address his own insecurities and fears, particularly regarding challenges to his authority, reputation, and ideological dominance. His strategies often reflect a desire to maintain control and project strength, which aligns with the theory that much of what he says and does is designed to assuage underlying fears.
Framing Opponents as Existential Threats: Trump’s rhetoric frequently casts progressives, liberals, and other opponents as threats to the nation’s values or security. This binary framing simplifies complex issues into battles of good versus evil, which not only rallies his base but also reinforces his role as a protector against these "threats"10. By portraying himself as indispensable, Trump addresses fears of losing relevance or control.
Obsession with Loyalty: Trump places immense importance on loyalty, both in his administration and among his supporters. This is evident in his efforts to replace career civil servants with loyalists and his dismissal of officials who challenge him38. Such actions suggest a deep aversion to dissent or perceived betrayal, reflecting fears of disloyalty undermining his authority.
Cultural Polarization as a Strategy: Trump’s focus on culture wars—such as banning DEI programs, attacking transgender rights, and removing progressive curricula—serves to solidify his base while marginalizing opposition69. These moves not only appeal to his supporters but also redirect attention away from criticisms of his leadership, addressing potential vulnerabilities in public perception.
Desire for Unchecked Authority: Trump’s attempts to expand executive power, such as challenging legal constraints on federal funding or dismissing inspectors general, reflect a drive to eliminate checks on his authority38. This aligns with fears of being constrained or losing control over policy and governance.
Emotional Appeals in Rhetoric: Trump’s speeches are characterized by emotional appeals that resonate with voter insecurities about cultural and economic changes10. This mirrors his own insecurities, as he seeks validation through public support while deflecting criticisms by scapegoating opponents
Fear of Political Liberals and Progressives
See this link for printable version of this narrative of Trump’s fear.
Trump’s policies and rhetoric reveal a strategic opposition to liberal/progressive values and priorities. He frames these values and priorities as threats to American ideals which are key to his appeal to his political base that voted him into office and, in his view, keep him in power. See examples below:
Cultural Opposition: Trump frequently positions himself as a defender against "woke" ideologies, progressive policies, and liberal academic institutions. This framing appeals to his base by portraying liberals as out-of-touch elites who undermine traditional values.
Policy Attacks: His administration has targeted progressive initiatives, such as diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, environmental regulations, and protections for marginalized communities. These actions are often framed as efforts to combat liberal overreach.
Rhetoric and Polarization: Trump uses inflammatory rhetoric to criticize liberals and progressives, calling them "radical leftists" or accusing them of promoting socialism. This language is designed to deepen ideological divides, rally his supporters, and keep liberal/progressives in defensive mode.
Strategic Use of Division: Trump’s opposition to progressive policies can be seen as part of a broader strategy to consolidate support among less-educated voters who feel alienated by liberal elites. By framing progressives as cultural competitors, he strengthens the loyalty of his base as a way of maintaining political power that enables him to ameliorate his fears.
Fear of Social Justice Movements
See this link for printable version of this narrative of Trump’s fear.
Trump’s fear of social justice movements stems from the power of movements to disrupt his narrative of authoritarian control and expose systemic injustices. His strategies—suppressing dissent, revising history, and isolating global human rights frameworks—aim to neutralize these threats. However, sustained grassroots activism and institutional pushback reveal the limitations of his approach, underscoring the resilience of movements committed to equity and accountability. Donald Trump’s fear of social justice movements is rooted in their potential to challenge his political agenda, expose systemic inequities, and mobilize public opposition. His administration’s actions (see below) reflect strategies to undermine these movements and consolidate power.
Executive Order Against DEI: Trump’s day-one executive order terminating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs aimed to erase decades of progress toward workplace equality. The order disproportionately harms marginalized groups, including communities of color, LGBTQ+ individuals, and women, by dismantling policies designed to address systemic discrimination14.
"1776 Report" and Historical Revisionism: The Trump administration promoted a revisionist narrative that downplays racism’s legacy in U.S. history, comparing civil rights activists to defenders of slavery. This effort seeks to delegitimize racial justice movements and frame equity initiatives as divisive4.
Weaponizing Federal Power: Trump’s administration used legal threats to pressure institutions like Yale University and Microsoft into halting DEI efforts, creating a chilling effect on corporate and academic anti-racism work4.
Suppressing Protests and Dissent
Crackdown on Racial Justice Protests: During the 2020 George Floyd protests, federal agencies deployed tear gas, unmarked detention vans, and surveillance tactics against peaceful demonstrators. Internal documents later revealed attempts to conceal these actions, highlighting Trump’s prioritization of suppressing dissent over accountability6.
Attacks on Student Activism: Recent efforts to ban masks at Columbia University and other institutions aim to stifle student-led protests, particularly those addressing police violence and racial inequality. These measures mirror broader attempts to criminalize dissent8.
Undermining International Human Rights Frameworks:
Withdrawal from Global Accountability: Trump’s administration disengaged from the UN Human Rights Council, defunded refugee agencies, and sanctioned International Criminal Court officials. These actions disrupt mechanisms that hold governments accountable for human rights violations, indirectly weakening solidarity with global social justice movements5.
Ethnic Cleansing Rhetoric: Trump’s threats of ethnic cleansing in Gaza exemplify his disregard for international human rights norms, further isolating the U.S. from global justice efforts5.
Fear of Being Held Legally Accountable for His Actions
See this link for printable version of this narrative of Trump’s fear.
Donald Trump has repeatedly demonstrated a fear of being held legally accountable for his actions through a pattern of behavior aimed at undermining or evading legal scrutiny:
Retaliation Against Legal Opposition: In 2025, Trump issued executive orders targeting prominent law firms involved in investigations or litigation against him, such as Perkins Coie, Paul, Weiss, and WilmerHale. These orders revoked security clearances, terminated government contracts, and barred attorneys from federal buildings; actions widely viewed as attempts to intimidate and punish those pursuing legal accountability. Legal experts and judges noted that these moves cast a "chilling harm" across the legal profession and were challenged in court as abuses of power intended to deter legal opposition3.
Undermining Independent Oversight: Trump signed executive orders stripping power from independent regulatory agencies, requiring them to submit major regulations for White House review and coordinate legal positions with the executive branch. This was seen as an illegal power grab to erode agency independence and shield presidential actions from external legal checks, prompting lawsuits from multiple political committees and ongoing legal scrutiny3.
Defiance of Court Rulings: Trump has resisted compliance with court decisions that block his executive actions, such as the attempt to end birthright citizenship and the dismantling of USAID. He has continued to pursue these policies despite multiple federal judges ruling them unconstitutional or exceeding presidential authority, signaling a reluctance to accept judicial limits on his actions37.
Intimidation Campaigns Against Judges: In response to adverse rulings, Trump has waged intimidation campaigns targeting the judges responsible, further indicating a desire to avoid legal consequences and discourage judicial oversight7.
These actions collectively illustrate a pattern of attempting to evade, undermine, or retaliate against mechanisms of legal accountability, reflecting a persistent fear of being held responsible under the law.
Fear of Not Being Seen as Wealthy
See this link for printable version of this narrative of Trump’s fear.
While Trump has not openly stated a fear of being poor, his lifelong focus on wealth accumulation, public image, and legal maneuvers to protect his fortune indicate that preserving his status as a wealthy individual is of paramount importance to him. Several aspects of Trump’s life and public persona suggest that maintaining wealth and projecting affluence are central to his identity:
Emphasis on Wealth: Trump has consistently promoted himself as "really rich" and has made his financial success a core part of his personal brand and political appeal. He has frequently discussed his net worth publicly, sometimes inflating figures to reinforce his image as a billionaire126.
Inherited Wealth and Financial Maneuvering: Trump was born into a wealthy family and received substantial financial support from his father, Fred Trump, including millions in inheritance and ongoing financial assistance throughout his life135. Investigations have shown he went to great lengths, sometimes through questionable or fraudulent means, to preserve and increase his wealth3.
Business Decisions and Legal Actions: Trump has engaged in thousands of legal actions, including bankruptcies and lawsuits, often aimed at protecting his assets and business interests6. He has also used political fundraising and business ventures to support his financial standing1.
Public Statements and Behavior: While Trump has not directly voiced a fear of poverty, his public behavior—such as boasting about his wealth, aggressively defending his business reputation, and reacting strongly to financial setbacks—suggests a deep concern with avoiding the appearance or reality of financial loss16.
He craves associations with people who are very wealthy:
Donald Trump has consistently demonstrated a strong desire to associate with very wealthy individuals, both in his political and personal spheres. This ongoing pursuit of relationships with the ultra-wealthy underscores Trump’s affinity for wealth and status, and reflects his belief that being surrounded by rich and powerful individuals enhances his own image and access to resources136. This pattern is evident in several ways:
Cabinet and Administration Choices: Trump assembled what is widely recognized as the wealthiest presidential administration in modern U.S. history, appointing at least 13 billionaires and numerous multimillionaires to top government posts, including cabinet positions and ambassadorships. These individuals came from industries such as real estate, finance, entertainment, and technology, and many were not only wealthy but also personal friends or major donors to Trump368.
Campaign Donors and Advisors: Trump's campaigns have been heavily supported by some of the richest people in the country. For the 2024 campaign, his top billionaire backers have contributed hundreds of millions of dollars, and he has actively courted support from high-profile billionaires like Elon Musk, Steve Schwarzman, and others256.
Personal and Business Relationships: In both business and politics, Trump has maintained close relationships with wealthy business partners and friends, often highlighting these associations as evidence of his own success and influence47.
Fear of His Personal Physical Decline and Aesthetic Appeal
See this link for printable version of this narrative of Trump’s fear.
Donald Trump’s vanity regarding his physical appearance is well documented and frequently discussed. He is known for his distinctive hairstyle, which he has defended as a unique combing style rather than a comb-over, and his tanned, often orange-tinged skin, which has been widely speculated to be the result of tanning products or treatments. Trump’s concern with his appearance extends to smaller details, such as the size of his hands, which he has publicly defended against insults by sending photos to media figures to prove their size.
His physical vanity is often linked to broader traits of narcissism, including a constant need for admiration and attention. Analysts describe him as someone who is highly self-absorbed, frequently fishing for compliments, and sensitive to criticism about his appearance or stature. This preoccupation with image is part of a larger pattern of behavior characterized by grandiosity and a desire to control how he is perceived by the public.
Trump’s vanity about his physical appearance is a notable aspect of his public persona, reflected in his distinctive grooming choices, defensive reactions to perceived insults, and the broader narcissistic traits that shape his behavior and public image. See articles below for more about these issues:
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/the-7-oddest-things-donald-trump-thinks-214354/
https://people.com/celebrity/donald-trump-sends-vanity-fair-editor-photos-of-his-hands/
https://www.theglobalist.com/narcissism-and-donald-trump-united-states/
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/04/donald-trumps-latest-bizarre-phobia-dangerous-fruit.html
A pattern associated with appearance that is well documented throughout Trump’s public and private life is his pronounced desire to associate with beautiful women as reported in the following:
Personal Relationships: Trump has been married to three women, all of whom were models or had careers focused on their appearance. His relationships have often been highly publicized, and his reputation as a "playboy" was a significant part of his early public persona25.
Business Ventures: Trump owned or co-owned the Miss Universe, Miss USA, and Miss Teen USA pageants, giving him frequent opportunities to be surrounded by young, attractive women. He often used business as an excuse to associate with and comment on the appearance of women, and he was known for making boundary-crossing remarks and taking pride in his proximity to beauty pageant contestants45.
Public Comments and Behavior: Trump has a long history of making public comments about women’s looks, both praising and criticizing. He has been quoted as saying he considers it his right to be surrounded by "beautiful" women and has made numerous sexist and objectifying remarks, both in public and private settings. For example, he has commented on the physical appearance of women he works with, contestants on his reality show, and even his own daughter345.
Symbolic Value: Reports and biographical accounts describe Trump as viewing women as "objects of desire or trophies," reinforcing the idea that being seen with beautiful women is a key part of his self-image and public identity14.
Trump’s associations with beautiful women are not incidental but a deliberate and consistent aspect of his vanity and public persona in which he is always conscious to bolster his image of success, desirability, and power1245.
Fear that Democrats Will Control Both Houses of Congress
See this link for printable version of this narrative of Trump’s fear.
Warnings made by Donald Trump and his Republican allies about the consequences of what will happen if democrats/progressives control American governments include the following:
Accusations of taking the country backward:
Claims about threats to democracy and American values:
Allegations of enabling crime and chaos:
Warnings about economic decline:
Warnings about public broadcasting and media:
Because these warnings are quoted so often, there is good reason to assume that anyone — including President Trump — who uses this rhetoric actually fears democratic/progressive control of government. Moreover, President Trump has his own special reasons for fearing democrats: If both houses of Congress are controlled by democrats, they are likely to pursue impeachment proceedings against him.
These are all purely existential fears. No one — not even Democrats — know that what future will be for America — even regarding the impeachment issue. Nevertheless, Trump and Republicans use these fears to preserve their positions in government and mobilize voters who harbor a general distrust of government to reject Democrats in favor or Republican candidates.
Fear of History
See this link for printable version of this narrative of Trump’s fear.
There is much evidence that President Trump demonstrates a pronounced aversion to particular aspects of American history that challenge his personal beliefs and political interests. This pattern is evident in both his rhetoric and his policy actions.
As a presidential candidate and as president, Trump has repeatedly sought to reshape, minimize, or erase elements of U.S. history that expose any of his other fears or raise doubt about his policies. Examples include punishing schools that teach accurate accounts of slavery, history of racism, and benefits of immigration to American culture and economy. These policies amount to revision of history to fit his sanitized view of American history. Historians and educators widely warn that these efforts represent an authoritarian impulse to control collective memory and suppress critical examination of the past or his own policies.
Rather than acknowledging inspiration from previous presidents or embracing the complexity of America’s historical legacy, Trump’s public statements and speeches are notable for their lack of historical reference and their reliance on nostalgia for a selectively imagined “golden age”. He rarely invokes American heroes or foundational moments, instead positioning himself as the singular figure who can “fix” the country, a stance that departs from the tradition of grounding leadership in historical precedent.
This avoidance and manipulation of history are not just rhetorical but are reflected in executive actions, such as dismantling the department of education and efforts to change the names of landmarks or to limit the teaching of certain historical facts in public institutions. Critics argue that this approach is rooted in a fear of the accountability and complexity that honest engagement with history demands. By seeking to erase or rewrite uncomfortable truths, Trump’s actions suggest a deep-seated apprehension about how historical facts might judge him and his vision for America.
In summary, Trump’s relationship with history—marked by denial, revision, and selective memory—can be reasonably interpreted as reflecting a fear of history’s power to challenge, critique, and hold him accountable.
https://www.npr.org/2025/05/21/nx-s1-5389638/trump-executive-actions-american-history-culture
https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/03/politics/why-is-trump-rewriting-us-economic-history
Fear of Reality
See this link for printable version of this narrative of Trump’s fear.
President Trump has two well-documented behaviors that indicate a fear of reality. This is another way of saying that he fears truth. It also explains why he lies so much.
He often ignores scientific facts that are generally accepted as truth by most Americans regardless of political affiliation. He repeatedly suppresses, downplays, discredits or ignores scientific research when it conflicts with his policy goals and political messaging — oftentimes by labeling scientific facts as fake news without any evidence. This was especially evident in areas such as climate change, public health and economics, where experts were pressured to restrict access to information or cast doubt on established science. As President, Trump further acted on those fears by defunding research, silencing, scientists, and spreading lies that contradicted scientific truth.
He often reframes news that is not complementary of him as lies (i.e. fake news). This tactic is a consistent feature of his communication style. Fact-checkers and media analysts have documented tens of thousands of false or misleading claims by Trump — many of which involved dismissing or distorting widely accepted facts. By redefining “fake news” to encompass any reporting he disliked, Trump contributed to public confusion and eroded trust in both the media and scientific institutions. These behaviors can be interpreted as indicative of a “fear of reality” in the sense that they involve systematic avoidance or denial of inconvenient truths in favor of narratives more favorable to Trump’s financial interests, political interests or worldview. This approach has had significant consequences for public discourse, politics, scientific integrity, and the broader understanding of reality among the American public. The only logical explanation for these habits is that he fears what will happen to him if people — especially his supporters — accept commonly held realities as absolute truths.
These two behaviors describe a set of experiences where individuals -- including DJT -- feel intense anxiety or discomfort when confronted with aspects of reality (i.e. truth) that they find distressing or overwhelming. This phenomenon can overlap with several established psychological concepts:
Depersonalization-Derealization Disorder: Individuals with this disorder may feel disconnected from themselves (depersonalization) or from their surroundings (derealization), often as a response to stress or trauma. While they are aware that their altered perceptions are not reality, these feelings can be deeply unsettling and may lead to avoidance of confronting real-life situations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depersonalization-derealization_disorder
https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/mental-derealization-overview
https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/9791-depersonalization-derealization-disorder
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/conditions/depersonalizationderealization-disorder
F.E.A.R. (False Evidence Appearing Real): This concept describes how people sometimes experience fear based on imagined or exaggerated threats rather than actual dangers. Such fears can lead to avoidance behaviors and a reluctance to face reality, even when the perceived threat is not supported by facts.
Phobic Reactions: In cases of phobias, individuals experience irrational and disproportionate fear of specific objects, situations, or ideas, often leading them to avoid reality or certain aspects of it to reduce anxiety.
Because President Trump’s fears adversely affect his thinking and behaviors, he habitually exposes himself to criticism and ridicule. Many people — especially his political opponents — experience a distinct sense of satisfaction when learning about and reporting Donald Trump's unusual behaviors, problematic policies, and personal problems. His political base, on the other hand, tends to believe what his lies or dismiss them because they find him mostly credible and trustworthy.
He makes himself a target for social media posts, unflattering cartoons and news every time his words contradict verifiable facts, or his actions violate established social and political norms. These anti-Trump public responses to his words and behaviors provide a sense of validation or even catharsis for critics who love to hate him.
Psychologically, the satisfaction for anti-Trump critics comes from several factors:
Norm Violation and Outrage: Trump's behavior is frequently described as transgressive, which provokes strong emotional reactions. For many, especially liberals and moderates, reporting on his actions is a way to reaffirm shared values and express collective outrage.
Schadenfreude: There is an element of schadenfreude—pleasure derived from another's misfortune—when Trump's missteps or oddities are exposed, especially given his polarizing persona and history of antagonizing critics.
Community and Identity: Sharing and discussing Trump's behavior helps build a sense of community among political liberals, reinforcing group identity and providing a shared narrative.
Media Dynamics: The media’s extensive coverage of Trump’s behavior, often highlighting the most sensational or strange moments, feeds public fascination and encourages further discussion and reporting.
This cycle is amplified by mainstream media and social media, where reactions to Trump’s actions—ranging from mockery to genuine concern—spread rapidly and become trending topics, further fueling the satisfaction some feel in spotlighting his perceived flaws or failures. But while these attacks may yield some short-term satisfaction for Trump’s detractors, they do nothing to change Mr. Trump or his MAGA supporters. In fact, public criticism solidifies his adoring base and inspires them to rally his defense. This happens for several reasons:
Criticism from mainstream sources is reframed as unfair attacks or confirmation of bias, prompting Trump’s followers to see themselves and their leader as united against a hostile “establishment.” This unity strengthens group identity and fosters intense loyalty.
Legal challenges, negative news, and media investigations regularly trigger a “rally around Trump” effect among Republicans and conservative-leaning independents. For example, after high-profile indictments or accusations, Trump’s support within his base surged, turning potential weaknesses into mobilization moments.
Trump’s rhetoric often encourages the perception that criticism is not just about him, but about his supporters and their values. This personalization drives collective action, with followers defending both Trump and their political worldview against perceived attacks.
The dynamic contributes to Trump's ongoing ability to defy conventional political expectations: rather than alienating supporters, controversies and criticism strengthen their resolve and willingness to overlook his personal and policy flaws.
Whether Mr. Trump intentionally lies for these reasons or not is unknown. What is known, however, that his lies and the public criticism they arouse in media energizes, rather than erodes, Trump’s base which rallies to defend him more fervently. In effect, his lies push his followers to disengage from mainstream institutions they perceive as adversarial. Psychological and civic research shows several mechanisms at play in responses to Trump's lies:
Many Trump supporters are already civically disengaged or distrustful of mainstream institutions like national media, government agencies, and established parties. When Trump is criticized for dishonesty or unethical behavior, his base often interprets this as an attack from adversarial, untrustworthy elites, reinforcing in-group loyalty and alienation from those institutions.
Public criticism and “fact-checking” from media are viewed by Trump loyalists as proof of a biased establishment intent on undermining their values and leader. This perceived adversarial relationship increases polarization and drives deeper emotional investment in defending Trump, sometimes regardless of the validity of the criticisms.
When lies or misinformation are exposed and widely condemned, Trump uses rhetorical strategies (claiming victimhood, attacking his critics, framing himself as a champion against corrupt elites) to strengthen bonds with followers and galvanize resistance to institutional authority and expertise.
Populist leaders like Trump have strategically disengaged from international and domestic institutions that oppose their narratives, criticizing, obstructing, or withdrawing from collaborations as a form of performative opposition. This disengagement is tactical—it creates solidarity among followers and heightens their sense of embattled purpose.
In effect, the cycle of public lying, criticism, and defensiveness pushes Trump’s followers to distrust and disengage further from mainstream social, media, and political institutions. Instead, they embrace alternative networks and echo chambers more aligned with their beliefs. If Trump's critics understood these dynamics, they might not be so aggressive in their attacks.
TRUMP’S RHETORIC RESONATES WITH HIS SUPPORTER’S BECAUSE HE “TELLS IT LIKE IT IS”
The emotional resonance of President Trump’s rhetoric exists because his speeches about fear, insecurity and resentment mirror the fears, insecurities and resentments of his supporters. Every speech creates and reinforces a powerful feedback loop between leader and base.
Donald Trump’s supporters often say he "tells it like it is," meaning they perceive him as an authentic, straightforward speaker who expresses what they want to say but dare not say in public. Perplexity AI summarizes the complexity and nuance of these attitudes as follows:
Authenticity Despite Falsehoods: Studies show that many Trump supporters view him as authentic even when he makes false or exaggerated statements. They interpret his bold, brash style as a form of symbolic protest against the political establishment, valuing his challenge to elites over factual accuracy. This perceived authenticity fuels their enthusiasm and loyalty3.
Relishing Brashness and Defiance: Supporters often embrace Trump’s exaggerations and outright lies because they see his "say-whatever" style as a sign of strength and defiance. They appreciate his audacity to say things others won’t, especially when he mocks or attacks perceived enemies like the media, Democrats, or the establishment. For them, his willingness to flout norms is part of his appeal1.
Emotional and Cultural Resonance: Trump’s rhetoric taps into voter insecurities, grievances, and resentments. His direct, unfiltered communication style resonates with those who feel ignored or marginalized by traditional politicians. His rhetoric’s simplicity, repetition, and confrontational tone foster a sense of loyalty and identification among supporters4.
Performance of Authenticity: Some analysts argue that Trump’s "telling it like it is" is a carefully crafted persona rather than literal blunt truth-telling. His overconfidence and theatrical style create an impression of forthrightness, even when his claims are misleading or false. This performance satisfies voters who want a leader who appears to share their feelings and frustrations, regardless of factual accuracy.
When Trump’s supporters say he "tells it like it is," what they mean is that he is factually reporting their fears, anxieties and frustrations.
Trump supporters often feel that American values, traditions, and economic prosperity are under threat, leading to strong alignment with Trump’s messaging.
The sense of losing status—whether defined by race, religion, gender, or class—is a powerful motivator. Many Trump voters perceive existential threats from changing social dynamics, such as increased diversity and shifting power structures that minimize their control in politics and culture.
There are several psychological drivers that predict radical support for Trump by some people
Psychological mechanisms such as confirmation bias, cognitive dissonance, and echo chambers make supporters more likely to trust information that validates their fears and beliefs while dismissing the rest.
Fear and anxiety—including fears of terrorism, crime, and foreign influence—are more pronounced among Trump supporters than in the general population, and Trump’s promises of protection and toughness provide reassurance.
Trump’s charismatic and assertive public persona, as well as his use of conspiracy theories, reinforce a narrative of threats and the need for a “strongman” to deliver safety.
He channels latent anger and fear and offers simple solutions and scapegoats, which appeals to those seeking certainty and agency in chaotic times.
What supporters admire and value in Trump is his boldness, defiance, and perceived authenticity to express their fears and take radical measures to allay those fears. He is a symbol of resistance and empowerment for followers who feel marginalized by the political, economic and social status quo. They see his rhetoric as a form of protest and empowerment against the political establishment and intellectual elites whom they fear. They perceive him as giving voice to frustrations that, in their view, have been dismissed or silenced by those in power or by mainstream media and academia. They welcome and embrace his exaggerations and behaviors because he is doing what they want to do but are unable to do for lack of money and authority. His communication style is less about factual honesty and more about emotional resonance and opposition to people who have, or seem to be acquiring, more power and influence than they do (e.g., Democrats, liberal media, people with education and money, etc.)
HOW TRUMP LEVERAGES HIS FEARS FOR POLITICAL POWER
As of late July 2025, 45% (+/-) of Americans approve of President Trump’s performance in office. That is slightly less than the number that voted for him in 2024. Each American who approves of Trump’s performance has his/her own reasons for their opinions, but one thing they agree on is that Mr. Trump is a strong leader. This perception has been consistent across multiple polls and election cycles. Surveys repeatedly show that Trump’s supporters, especially Republicans, cite his leadership qualities—described as “strong,” “decisive,” and “willing to fight for American interests”—as a core reason for their approval
Here is how Perplexity AI explains their beliefs:
Trump’s followers perceive him as a strong, fearless leader largely because of his unwavering self-belief, confident and bold leadership style, and his readiness to confront opponents aggressively. His refusal to back down in difficult situations and willingness to make decisions that defy norms reinforces the image of fearlessness and strength. This audacity and unapologetic confidence resonate deeply with his base, who value a leader who prioritizes personal convictions over external approval and challenges the status quo.
Psychologically, many of Trump’s most loyal supporters form what researchers describe as a personality cult around him—viewing him as infallible and uniquely capable of protecting the country from threats. This cult-like loyalty is marked by disciplined, stable allegiance and perception of Trump as a savior figure. This provides his followers with assurance and strong identification with his fearless leadership persona.
Additionally, Trump’s leadership style—characterized by strategic risk-taking and commanding narrative control—furthers the perception of him as a decisive and fearless figure, willing to push forward despite criticism or controversy. His bold and often unfiltered rhetoric strengthens his appeal as a leader who is not afraid to stand firm, which consolidates his followers' trust and admiration.
In summary, Trump’s followers think he is a strong and fearless leader because of his confident, bold, and unapologetic approach to leadership, his role as a symbolic protector in their eyes, and his ability to command loyalty through an image of unwavering self-belief and decisive action.
That is what Trump’s follower believe. But the truth is that Mr. Trump is not what he appears to be. On the surface he appears strong, but inside he is a weak man full of the fears itemized in this post. Undiscerning Americans don’t see the real Trump because he has carefully crafted compensating public behaviors that create a deceptive aura of masculine strength. He is a fraud, but his followers don’t know it.
Trump’s followers don’t know he is a fraud because, to one degree or another, they are plagued by the same assortment of fears that bother him. If they said that he is a fraud, they would be condemning themselves for lack of awareness of his real nature.
What they admire about him is the success he has achieved in managing his fears. He is one of them but is different from them because he projects confidence and assertiveness in fear management that they do not possess
Analysts and sociologists have discussed how Trump’s political rhetoric often highlights threats (e.g. crime, immigration, terrorism, etc.) that stoke a climate of fear and anxiety and positions himself as the one who can confront and overcome these dangers. This approach taps into widespread fears and uncertainties, promising not only protection but also a kind of vicarious mastery over those threats.
Trump is described as an expert at leveraging fear in political messaging. His message may be summarized this way: Be very, very afraid. I am the cure. By emphasizing dangers and casting himself as the only one who can manage or neutralize their fears (“I alone can fix it”), Trump frames himself as both similar to his followers (he shares their fears) and exceptional (he knows how to conquer them). This strategy fosters a nearly heroic status in the eyes of supporters.
Leadership theorists note that Trump employs "leadership by fear," combined with a fast-paced, chaotic decision style that creates an environment where division and a sense of crisis are ever-present. Supporters rally behind this perceived boldness and strength because he has the will and guts to do for them what they cannot do for themselves. Thus they concede to him the authority (i.e. political power) to act on their behalf.
BULLIES USE FEAR AS A WEAPON TO CONTROL OTHERS
Perhaps the clearest evidence that Trump’s rhetoric is not purely exploitive (i.e. for his personal benefit) lies in the fact that he shows no reluctance to bully, abuse and reject people who follow him, submit to his authority, praise him and give him money. Trump’s idea of loyalty is a one-way track. He expects it from others, but he will quickly cut loose anyone who is not 100% loyal to him. His penchant for revenge and retribution does not fit with the concept of exploitation. He can switch from buddy to bully in an instant when anyone crosses him in big ways or small ways. This behavioral pattern is well-documented by psychologists and observers of his leadership and communication style.
Personality Profile: Psychological assessments describe Trump as having a dominant, controlling, and impulsive personality, with secondary traits of volatility and suspicion. These traits make him highly reactive—he can appear outgoing and charming one moment, but quickly become belligerent and aggressive if he feels challenged or disrespected13. Experts note that this volatility is linked to narcissistic and borderline personality features, including hypersensitivity to perceived slights and a tendency toward impulsive anger3.
Documented Incidents: In high-stakes settings—such as meetings with world leaders or public debates—Trump’s mood has been observed to shift abruptly. For example, during confrontations, he can go from cordial to enraged in seconds, raising his voice and resorting to personal attacks or threats when contradicted23. This has been described as "borderline rage," where any challenge to his ego or authority can trigger a disproportionate, combative reaction3.
Bullying Tactics: Trump’s style often involves verbal intimidation, mockery, and public shaming. He uses nicknames, insults, and direct threats to coerce or undermine those he perceives as opponents or even allies who do not show loyalty245. His rhetoric is confrontational and binary, framing issues as battles between friends and enemies, and he is quick to escalate conflicts rather than de-escalate or withdraw5.
Low Empathy and Emotional Detachment: Trump’s lack of empathy and emotional detachment further amplify this dynamic. He rarely considers others’ feelings and is primarily focused on asserting his own interests and dominance, which makes his transitions from friendly to hostile particularly abrupt and jarring3.
Trump’s rapid switch from "buddy" to "bully" reflects a personality profile marked by impulsivity, emotional volatility, and a deep need for dominance and validation that is born out of his many fears and insecurities. When anyone crosses him—no matter how minor the offense—he is quick to abandon friendliness for aggression, using bullying as a primary strategy to reassert control and protect his ego12345.
Bullies often exhibit behaviors that mask their vulnerabilities, including fear. Admitting fear would undermine the image of strength and control they strive to maintain. Here are some reasons why bullies might not admit to being afraid:
Showing fear diminishes image of indomitable strength
Maintaining Dominance: Bullies typically aim to project an image of power and invincibility. Admitting fear would compromise this image and potentially weaken their influence over others.
Social Perception: In social dynamics, showing vulnerability can lead to loss of status or respect among peers. Bullies often rely on this status to maintain their position.
They fear showing vulnerability
Protecting Ego: Bullies may fear that acknowledging fear would expose them to ridicule or exploitation by others. This vulnerability could be used against them, undermining their authority.
Loss of Control: By not admitting fear, bullies maintain control over their narrative and avoid being seen as weak or susceptible to emotional manipulation.
Social and Cultural Pressures
Cultural Norms: In some cultures, showing fear is seen as a sign of weakness to be avoided — especially for men who may feel pressured to conform to these norms to maintain their social standing.
Peer Pressure: The desire to fit in with a group or maintain peer respect can also prevent bullies from admitting fear.
All of these fears are strongly at work in everything that President Trump says and does. Because these fears are also strongly at work in his supporters, they praise his bullying tactics. In their minds, he appears to act out the bully role with impunity —which is something they could never do. He is their surrogate bully. This dynamic leads to strong loyalty despite Trump’s controversial behaviors.
THE SPECIAL CASE OF REPUBLICAN CONGRESSPERSONS
Beyond political opponents, President Trump’s favorite target for bullying is Republicans in both houses of Congress. He never relents from bullying them because, with few exceptions, they always submit to his demands. Republican congresspersons continue to submit to his bullying for several obvious reasons:
Fear of political isolation
Fear of loss of party support
Fear of being “primaried” in their next election
Fear of not being reelected to another term.
Fear of retaliation from Trump and his followers
The common denominator of these reasons for submitting to bullying is fear.
It would not be a stretch of the truth to say that Republicans in general, and Republican congresspersons in particular, embody many, maybe all, of the same fears that President Trump exhibits. (The same may be said of Democratic congresspersons, but that is not as relevant when the President a Republican.) It is also true that the power of these fears weighs so heavily on Republican congresspersons that it affects their ability to think clearly and act logically. America will not function well with leaders who cannot think clearly and act logically.
Because they are handicapped by fear, Republican congresspersons do not obey their oaths to the Constitution:
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God."
When Republican congresspersons submit to Trump’s bullying to pass legislation or confirm his appointees, they become oath breakers and accomplices to Trump’s authoritarianism. As long as they are the majority party, they are not likely to be disciplined by their fellow congresspersons for breaking their oaths. But they can, and should be, disciplined by voters at the next election and replaced by fearless politicians of character who will not submit to Trump’s bullying.
Replacement will not happen, however, unless voters are mindful of the fears Mr. Trump and Republican congresspersons. But more than just being mindful of those fears, voters must be willing to discipline Republican congresspersons for breaking their oaths and exhibiting poor character while carrying out their duties as lawmakers. They can discipline congresspersons four main ways:
Stop giving them money.
Publicly protest their offenses to the Constitution.
Send letters and emails with these messages to their congressional representatives:
They (i.e. the voters) are paying attention to their behaviors.
Itemized fears that they observe.
Itemized evidence of oath breaking.
Itemized evidence of poor character.
Warnings that they will not vote for them again unless and until they stop breaking their oaths of office and stop submitting to Trump’s bullying.
Warnings that they (i.e. voters) are recruiting new candidates with good character.
The other important thing voters can do is share what they know about fear in social media. Each fear in EXAMPLES OF MR. TRUMP’S FEARS is a link that can be easily posted in social media — especially social media that are most popular with MAGA. Since people who oppose Trump are probably not already subscribers to these social media platforms, they will need to make special efforts to reach MAGA people through these platforms. They can do this easily by creating new email addresses and anonymous identities with providers who do not require subscribers’ phone numbers. These fake identities can be used safely for posting in MAGA-friendly social media. This strategy will be discussed in detail in future Make American Better posts.
This strategy has great potential to create doubt about the mental health of Mr. Trump and congresspersons who submit to his bullying. Who know, perhaps these seeds of doubt might be enough to dissuade MAGA voters from giving them money and voting for them. America will not become better until MAGA voters change their minds and hearts about Trump and his accomplices in congress.
The plain message here is this: America will not become a better place until voters discipline themselves to monitor the behaviors of political candidates with respect to good character and poor character and then vote for candidates who demonstrate good character.
But evaluating character is only the bare minimum of what it means to be a true patriot. There are many strategies that individual Americans can pursue to make America better. Whatever they do, however, they need to be careful that they do not make America worse by employing insensitive, unproductive strategies to change hearts and minds. If they do not pursue doable, practical strategies, they will trigger a “backfire effect” that will have the opposite result of what they hope for.
HOW TO WEAPONIZE KNOWLEDGE OF TRUMP’S FEARS
While it is impossible, unfair and unprofessional to analyze President Trump from words and behaviors reported in the media, the multitude of media reports and professional papers about the effects of fear on the human brain provide useful insights about his fears and how they affect the thinking and behaviors of Trump and his supporters.
Every day, President Trump’s displays of dissociation, sociopathy, attachment avoidance, narcissism and lying reveal the variety of coping strategies he uses to manage his fears and anxieties. But, while knowing what make President Trump tick is interesting, the bigger question is how to use that knowledge profitably during elections.
There is no way to estimate how moderate conservative, and independent voters might change their opinions about President Trump and his loyalists in Congress if they had insights into the mental health and the psychology that drives his behaviors. But current polling about dissatisfaction with Trump’s performance as president and polls about congressional Republicans show that many voters are seriously questioning the behaviors and thinking of Trump and his congressional loyalists. This is evidence that cognitive dissonance is beginning to bother some of his loyalists.
These polls provide encouragement that evidence of Trump’s inability to think clearly and act logically are beginning to raise serious doubt about his qualifications as political savior. Furthermore, some Republican voters are beginning to doubt that congressional Republicans have the will and courage to restrain overreach in Trump’s use of executive power. These trends inspire hope that doubt about Trump’s mental health will affect how disaffected moderate Republicans and independents will vote in 2026 and 2028. A strategy that incites those disaffected moderate Republicans and independents to swing their votes to Democrats has great potential to alter the character of politicians and America forever.
A strategy to forever change America’s political and social trajectory will be the content of a new Substack post coming in September 2025. Readers who want to learn about this strategy would do well to click the “subscribe” link below.
NOTE TO SUBSCRIBERS: All subscriptions to Make America Better are free. That means that everyone — including people who are not paid subscribers — can comment on posts. Subscribers will never be invited/asked to upgrade to paid subscriptions.
AUTHOR’S DISCLOSURES
I acknowledge that I utilized Perplexity AI as a resource for gathering information, clarifying complex topics, and ensuring the accuracy and depth of analyses in this Substack post. Most of the content is my original work. Unedited Perplexity contact typically appears in italics. Other Perplexity content has been edited and reformatted by me.
The content of this post may cause some readers to assume that I am a Democrat. I am not a member of the Democratic party and do not support it financially. Rather, I consider myself to be a True Patriot who, best I can, votes for political candidates on the basis of candidates’ good character — not party affiliation, not rhetoric, not promises to make change. My purpose in Make America Better: Vote for Character is to recruit and educate other True Patriots to also apply the principles of character when they vote.
In my opinion, Republicans currently in Congress are fake patriots undeserving of voters’ trust to govern America. Republican readers who disagree with my opinion would do well to read Voters' Guide to Choosing Elected Leaders with Good Character and Politicians with Bad Character Can't be Trusted. Democrats and independents would also do well to read and apply the principles in these links.
Paul Borene
Things you can do to make America better:
Share Make America Better freely.
Visit this link: https://www.thewaywesee.com/confrontchristiannationalism/strategies/